The AP Language and Composition exam's rhetorical analysis essay requires a sophisticated understanding of rhetoric and the ability to articulate that understanding clearly and concisely. This rubric breaks down the scoring criteria to help you understand what earns a high score and how to improve your analysis. We'll delve into each element, offering strategies for maximizing your performance.
Understanding the AP Language Rhetorical Analysis Essay
The goal of this essay isn't simply to summarize the text; it's to dissect the author's choices and explain how those choices create meaning and effect. You're essentially becoming a literary detective, uncovering the persuasive strategies employed by the author.
The Scoring Criteria: A Detailed Breakdown
The AP Language rhetorical analysis rubric generally assesses essays based on these key areas:
1. Argumentation (Thesis & Analysis):
-
High-Scoring Essays (7-9): Present a clearly stated thesis that directly addresses the prompt's requirements. This thesis isn't just a restatement of the prompt; it offers a specific and insightful interpretation of the author's rhetorical strategies and their impact. The analysis is thorough, insightful, and persuasive, moving beyond simple identification of devices to explore their purpose and effect. Expect sophisticated claims supported by insightful evidence.
-
Mid-Range Essays (5-6): Offer a thesis statement, but it may lack the precision or insight of higher-scoring essays. The analysis identifies some rhetorical devices but may not fully explore their purpose or impact. The evidence is present but may not always be fully integrated into the argument.
-
Low-Scoring Essays (1-4): May lack a clear thesis or present a thesis that misinterprets the text. The analysis is superficial, focusing on simply listing rhetorical devices without exploring their significance. Evidence is weak, irrelevant, or missing.
2. Evidence & Commentary:
-
High-Scoring Essays (7-9): Use specific and relevant textual evidence to support each claim. The commentary thoroughly explains how the evidence supports the analysis, going beyond simply stating "the author uses metaphor." The connections between evidence and analysis are seamless and insightful, revealing a deep understanding of the text's rhetorical nuances.
-
Mid-Range Essays (5-6): Offer evidence, but the connection to the analysis may be underdeveloped or unclear. Commentary might be present but lacks the depth and sophistication of higher-scoring essays.
-
Low-Scoring Essays (1-4): May lack sufficient or relevant evidence. Commentary may be absent or insufficient to support the claims. Evidence may be misrepresented or misinterpreted.
3. Sophistication of Argument:
-
High-Scoring Essays (7-9): Demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of rhetoric, going beyond surface-level analysis. They might explore complexities within the text, consider multiple perspectives, or offer insightful observations about the author's purpose and audience. The writing exhibits stylistic maturity and precision.
-
Mid-Range Essays (5-6): Show a basic understanding of rhetoric but may lack the depth or complexity of higher-scoring essays. The argument is generally clear but may not demonstrate nuanced understanding.
-
Low-Scoring Essays (1-4): Demonstrate a limited or inaccurate understanding of rhetoric. The argument may be unclear, simplistic, or irrelevant to the prompt.
4. Grammar and Mechanics:
-
High-Scoring Essays (7-9): Exhibit strong command of grammar, mechanics, and style. The writing is clear, concise, and polished.
-
Mid-Range Essays (5-6): Contain some errors in grammar and mechanics, but they do not significantly impede understanding.
-
Low-Scoring Essays (1-4): Contain numerous errors that significantly affect readability and understanding.
Strategies for Success
- Practice, practice, practice: Analyze various texts using the rubric as your guide.
- Develop a strong thesis: This is the cornerstone of your essay.
- Select relevant and insightful evidence: Don't just list devices; explain their impact.
- Craft sophisticated commentary: Connect your evidence directly to your argument.
- Review your work carefully: Check for grammar, mechanics, and clarity.
By understanding the rubric's components and employing effective strategies, you can significantly improve your performance on the AP Language rhetorical analysis essay. Remember, the key is to go beyond simple identification and delve into the why behind the author's choices.
